The bulk update request #49118 (forum #392571) has been approved by @evazion.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #49118 (forum #392571) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #49201 (forum #392854) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #49718 is pending approval.
create implication edelgard_von_hresvelg_(adrestian_emperor)_(resplendent) -> edelgard_von_hresvelg_(timeskip)
Upcoming official alternate costume from Fire Emblem Heroes
BUR #49719 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication female_corrin_(fate_dragon)_(fire_emblem) -> female_corrin_(fire_emblem)
Upcoming official alternate design from Fire Emblem Shadows
ls1547 said:
BUR #49718 is pending approval.
create implication edelgard_von_hresvelg_(adrestian_emperor)_(resplendent) -> edelgard_von_hresvelg_(timeskip)
Upcoming official alternate costume from Fire Emblem Heroes
This is another case of a four-level deep hierarchy for a single character:
The outfit itself is basically just a palette swap of an existing costume:
So we're implying an alternate costume to an alternate costume to an alternate form to the base character. Can we just make it Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Resplendent Adrestian Emperor) instead and have it directly imply Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Timeskip)? That would cut down on qualifiers and implication depth.
The bulk update request #49719 (forum #394847) has been approved by @evazion.
evazion said:
This is another case of a four-level deep hierarchy for a single character:
The outfit itself is basically just a palette swap of an existing costume:
So we're implying an alternate costume to an alternate costume to an alternate form to the base character. Can we just make it Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Resplendent Adrestian Emperor) instead and have it directly imply Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Timeskip)? That would cut down on qualifiers and implication depth.
Personally I am fine with it either way, but I get the argument that having that many levels of qualifiers and implications, in the case of a single character like Edelgard or the young Tiki legendary dragon resplendent further above can begin to feel a bit esoteric and contrived. I do think the character tag is fine the way it is even if the implication changes to directly imply Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Timeskip), but if anybody disagrees they can say so and I am also willing to change that if people think that Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Resplendent Adrestian Emperor) would be better than Edelgard Von Hresvelg (Adrestian Emperor) (Resplendent).
Why not imply Edelgard von Hresvelg (Adrestian Emperor) directly to Edelgard von Hresvelg instead? Adrestian Emperor is a costume so it's possible to draw pre-timeskip Edelgard wearing it and then the current implication is invalid.