Posted under Tags
BUR #49513 is pending approval.
create implication berserk_(ppg) -> blossom_(ppg)
create implication brat_(ppg) -> bubbles_(ppg)
create implication brute_(ppg) -> buttercup_(ppg)
create implication oppressor_plutonium -> professor_utonium
The Powerpunk Girls are evil alternate-dimension versions of the Powerpuff Girls
Updated by pipirupirupirupipirupi
I think he added the Utonium line?
So for this one, do we have any precedent on how to handle AU characters? My gut says these shouldn't be linked based on characters like Dark Link and Doppelganger Arle but I don't know if we have a standard for "Literally the same character from another universe"
BUR edits don't bump topics because they're not actually part of the forum post. The BUR syntax just renders as the BUR's text including its id, status and the requests. You're right though, Oppressor Plutonium's implication is a new line here, at least.
As far as I know, we usually keep alternate universe and dark personas separate since they're literally different characters. A recent example if you need even is Shiroko Terror (Blue Archive) being unimplied from Shiroko (Blue Archive).
Huh, never knew these alternate versions of the PPG existed and they've apparently been around since 2004. On a related note, should the Dc Powerpuff Girls copyright tag where these designs originated from be implied to the regular Powerpuff Girls tag?
post #8070453
Does Octi have a Powerpunk equivalent as well? He doesn't look any different from the regular one, though, so maybe we don't need a separate tag even if he does have one.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Huh, never knew these alternate versions of the PPG existed and they've apparently been around since 2004. On a related note, should the Dc Powerpuff Girls copyright tag where these designs originated from be implied to the regular Powerpuff Girls tag?
They were originally just tagged with the Powerpunk Girls gentag until OP made that copytag.
