1. Is there a tag for uterine penetration?

2. How is there a visible impregnation here? Seems to me that this would require fertilization of the ovum as visible under a microscope.

Whoa?! Since when have K. M.'s pics this style? Looks really much better than his old art. It's true, skill comes with practice.

(Too bad he hasn't changed the old fat men...)

hungkok2007 said:
1. Is there a tag for uterine penetration?

2. How is there a visible impregnation here? Seems to me that this would require fertilization of the ovum as visible under a microscope.

I'll do my best to translate, then you will see.
And at the unaturally high flow of semen in such pictures as these, and the duration of life of sperm cells, I'm all but certain that they'd find a home.
The only way for them not to is if the "receiver" is infertile somehow.

L_of_Shame said:
I'll do my best to translate, then you will see.
And at the unaturally high flow of semen in such pictures as these, and the duration of life of sperm cells, I'm all but certain that they'd find a home.
The only way for them not to is if the "receiver" is infertile somehow.

Yeah, but the nature of the tag implies that you can actually determine from just a picture that A) the receiver is or is not fertile, and B) that the home was actually found.

Doesn't tagging normally involve certainty and empirical visual evidence? Or does this fall under "you gonna get raped"?

this artist typically draws these girls being impregnated, they just sometimes don't draw the home being found, it's not unlikely that this is the case here.

While I appreciate that Danbooru can generally be trusted to host a higher class of patrons than those found on the likes of /h/, I feel that nitpicking the technicalities is missing the point of the image somewhat.