I know we're supposed to tag "what we see," but I'm having a hard time thinking that this deserves the solo tag, unless there's evidence that she's somehow covered in her own fluids.
Iruel said: I know we're supposed to tag "what we see," but I'm having a hard time thinking that this deserves the solo tag, unless there's evidence that she's somehow covered in her own fluids.
"solo" wiki said: The following conditions can also warrant use of this tag: ... Single characters being depicted as engaged in sex acts with a faceless/nameless other.
Solo is legit even when there are other people present in the picture.
