Added the wrong feet tag because… well… her feet are wrong.

Hey, that reason alone isn't sufficient for this to get deleted. Just add the corresponding tag and parent it to the revised post.

Really, this is too strict.

The uploader flagged it, and the revision is present. Kinda odd to keep the busted one.

Sacriven said:

Hey, that reason alone isn't sufficient for this to get deleted. Just add the corresponding tag and parent it to the revised post.

Really, this is too strict.

Is better to Flag the image, since the artist corrected that error immediately. However, keeping the child with the error isn't strictly necessary. If someone want to give a better use of the image or the Approver have a concrete idea about what to do with this image with errors, it could be good to keep visible the image.

OOZ662 said:

The uploader flagged it, and the revision is present. Kinda odd to keep the busted one.

Oh, if it's the will of the uploader, then okay.
But take note that not every child of a revised parent posts should deserve a deletion. Just parenting it is enough. This will set a bad example to future flaggers and they will abuse it as a reason for them to flag "bad" child posts.

Sacriven said:

But take note that not every child of a revised parent posts should deserve a deletion. Just parenting it is enough. This will set a bad example to future flaggers and they will abuse it as a reason for them to flag "bad" child posts.

In agreement with this. We need to take care to avoid creating examples that would encourage flaggers arbitrarily flagging a post simply because a revised version of it exists.

NWF_Renim said:

In agreement with this. We need to take care to avoid creating examples that would encourage flaggers arbitrarily flagging a post simply because a revised version of it exists.

I agree too, but most of those flags are made without revisions, overlooking the link after the image was posted, and just using opinions to justify something they didn't like, or just because they consider it "bad".

So someone still approved this version, although I also don't see what to make with this version. Wonder what they think about it, although it was the uploaders wish.

It was for practical reasons, not for: "Oh MY gOd!! THAT foot, IT does NOT FITS DANBOORU, DELETE PLS DELETE!!!"

When I upload the first image (with the error) I thought: "The author will draw another one tomorrow or the next days"; but checking his sites, at 5 minutes or less he already re-uploaded the image, so, in that case I thougth that flag the image was the best option, like uploading for approval in another cases.

MD5 mismatch of http://seiga.nicovideo.jp/seiga/im6198616

Fullsize already exists at post #2521935