The artist for this image goes by the name Zuma (written in hiragana). However, we already have an artist called Zuma, only with the original name in katakana. What's the recommended method for differentiating this one on Danbooru?
The artist for this image goes by the name Zuma (written in hiragana). However, we already have an artist called Zuma, only with the original name in katakana. What's the recommended method for differentiating this one on Danbooru?
The artist for this image goes by the name Zuma (written in hiragana). However, we already have an artist called Zuma, only with the original name in katakana. What's the recommended method for differentiating this one on Danbooru?
Generally a qualifier is added on the end in parenthesis; another name, circle name, the site they post to if different than the other, etc.
Given transcankolle just tagged the other similar posts with the former artist's tag, please look to changing them over if you create one.
Generally a qualifier is added on the end in parenthesis; another name, circle name, the site they post to if different than the other, etc.
I know that much; I was just unsure of whether any of those distinguishing elements existed in this case. I'd hoped that, by providing the Pixiv link, someone more experienced in such decisions would be able to point out the best choice on the artist's Pixiv profile page, since I didn't see anything there that stood out in that respect.
[Edit]: Seeing nothing else in terms of circle names, other home pages, etc., all I can go by is the artist's Twitter handle, so I guess I'll use that.
Given transcankolle just tagged the other similar posts with the former artist's tag, please look to changing them over if you create one.
@transcankolle I specifically mentioned that the existing Zuma artist tag referred to someone different from the Zuma who drew this image. That means you don't use the existing Zuma tag. That's why I asked about the recommended differentiation methods.
I know that much; I was just unsure of whether any of those distinguishing elements existed in this case. I'd hoped that, by providing the Pixiv link, someone more experienced in such decisions would be able to point out the best choice on the artist's Pixiv profile page, since I didn't see anything there that stood out in that respect.
[Edit]: Seeing nothing else in terms of circle names, other home pages, etc., all I can go by is the artist's Twitter handle, so I guess I'll use that.
@transcankolle I specifically mentioned that the existing Zuma artist tag referred to someone different from the Zuma who drew this image. That means you don't use the existing Zuma tag. That's why I asked about the recommended differentiation methods.
I'd hoped that, by providing the Pixiv link, someone more experienced in such decisions would be able to point out the best choice on the artist's Pixiv profile page, since I didn't see anything there that stood out in that respect.
Yeah, sorry, my lack of Moonrune decyphering capability means I tend to stay away from trying to figure out artist names myself.
