I wouldn't go that far, I'd just go where the enemies are on a rowboat, carrying one of these bad boys with me. ;w;
That's not solving the problem. That's just showing the shit heads they can do what they want and someone will clean up after them if they do enough bad stuff.
That's not solving the problem. That's just showing the shit heads they can do what they want and someone will clean up after them if they do enough bad stuff.
Sometimes in war, a commander must make a difficult decision. A good military commander is not a mercy or caring person, but one that can achieve most with least casualties. Cost-effective, if you want to be downright brutal.
Sometimes in war, a commander must make a difficult decision. A good military commander is not a mercy or caring person, but one that can achieve most with least casualties. Cost-effective, if you want to be downright brutal.
If you didn't see, this is not a hard choice needed to be made, this is more of a sadistic experiment needed further tests be be applied in larger scale. The point of making her go alone is stupid enough already. If she's a precious one time weapon, she will need escort. Yet, she's to go alone, to not make out any casualties on friendlies. If that's not shitty, define me one worse than that.
If you didn't see, this is not a hard choice needed to be made, this is more of a sadistic experiment needed further tests be be applied in larger scale. The point of making her go alone is stupid enough already. If she's a precious one time weapon, she will need escort. Yet, she's to go alone, to not make out any casualties on friendlies. If that's not shitty, define me one worse than that.
Then perhaps I am one hell of a shitty commander in every strategy games. I always send out that one lone experimental unit or team to test out their combat effects before formulating any plan to put them into conventional use. Sometimes I even use my own units as test subjects. *proceed to feel ashame*
