Her cubs.

And of course, though visually identifiable as girls, these cubs may include fox-boys dressed in that fashion; after all, until the 20th century most children up to around five years of age were brought up as girls before being breeched --- which is a dead shot against the 'Nurture' school versus 'Nature', since the little boys still went on to become brutal generals and industrialists --- sometimes for superstitious fairy-snatching reasons in primitive areas, but usually as social custom.

Certainly in Europe, dunno where in the East.

Hoi! I'm Kagerou!

Claverhouse said:

And of course, though visually identifiable as girls, these cubs may include fox-boys dressed in that fashion; after all, until the 20th century most children up to around five years of age were brought up as girls before being breeched --- which is a dead shot against the 'Nurture' school versus 'Nature', since the little boys still went on to become brutal generals and industrialists --- sometimes for superstitious fairy-snatching reasons in primitive areas, but usually as social custom.

Certainly in Europe, dunno where in the East.

What I don't understand is why it would specifically be fox boys.

Claverhouse said:

And of course, though visually identifiable as girls, these cubs may include fox-boys dressed in that fashion; after all, until the 20th century most children up to around five years of age were brought up as girls before being breeched --- which is a dead shot against the 'Nurture' school versus 'Nature', since the little boys still went on to become brutal generals and industrialists --- sometimes for superstitious fairy-snatching reasons in primitive areas, but usually as social custom.

Certainly in Europe, dunno where in the East.

Just because you're dressing small male children in fashions that don't close in the crotch doesn't mean you're not raising them as male.