Contrary to what pop culture might teach you... getting hit there is extremely unpleasant no matter what you have down there. Either way, it's filled with a lot of very sensitive nerves.
Contrary to what pop culture might teach you... getting hit there is extremely unpleasant no matter what you have down there. Either way, it's filled with a lot of very sensitive nerves.
Contrary to what pop culture might teach you... getting hit there is extremely unpleasant no matter what you have down there. Either way, it's filled with a lot of very sensitive nerves.
I mean, testicles are actually inner organs, that's why it hurts so god damn much, if you get kicked directly in your heart, it would hurt the same as if someone kicks you in the testicles (We are talking about physical-instant pain, not dying chances, so ignore the fact that you would die if that ever happens to you)
I mean, testicles are actually inner organs, that's why it hurts so god damn much, if you get kicked directly in your heart, it would hurt the same as if someone kicks you in the testicles (We are talking about physical-instant pain, not dying chances, so ignore the fact that you would die if that ever happens to you)
No one was contesting that testicles are a "weak point". There's just a bizarrely prevalent idea in a lot of media that women, because they lack testicles, are resistant or even immune to crotch checks, which is just fundamentally untrue. I don't know how comparable the pain is between the two for a hit of equal force, but you can absolutely down a woman with a good strike between the legs.
I mean, testicles are actually inner organs, that's why it hurts so god damn much, if you get kicked directly in your heart, it would hurt the same as if someone kicks you in the testicles (We are talking about physical-instant pain, not dying chances, so ignore the fact that you would die if that ever happens to you)
If testicles are an inner organ, why are they so exposed? Sounds like a design flaw to me, fam, gotta take it to QA again. Also, joke aside, I suddenly realize that the Roman torture of pulling all the organs out and hooking them would hurt a horrible lot. So thank you for what I never wanted to know.
If testicles are an inner organ, why are they so exposed? Sounds like a design flaw to me, fam, gotta take it to QA again. Also, joke aside, I suddenly realize that the Roman torture of pulling all the organs out and hooking them would hurt a horrible lot. So thank you for what I never wanted to know.
While I wouldn't disagree with them being a design flaw, there's actually a very good reason for them to be external. Sperm is extremely delicate, and changes in temperature in either direction will just kill them outright. Sperm wouldn't be able to survive if the testicles were constantly at average internal body temperatures, which is why the sack contracts and expands when colder or hotter, to protect your little guys from "extreme" temperatures.
While I wouldn't disagree with them being a design flaw, there's actually a very good reason for them to be external. Sperm is extremely delicate, and changes in temperature in either direction will just kill them outright. Sperm wouldn't be able to survive if the testicles were constantly at average internal body temperatures, which is why the sack contracts and expands when colder or hotter, to protect your little guys from "extreme" temperatures.
You're confusing cause and effect here. The testicles aren't outside the body because the sperms can't survive under average body temperature, they require the external temperature because the testicles are outside the body.
You're confusing cause and effect here. The testicles aren't outside the body because the sperms can't survive under average body temperature, they require the external temperature because the testicles are outside the body.
I mean, if we're having a serious discussion about this, both ideas are equally as likely to be right. Sperm production is at its peak at temperatures below internal body temp, this is a fact. What scientists don't know is whether testicles evolved to be external to facilitate this, or if they were always external and just evolved to work better at those temperatures.
But it doesn't matter, because our current anatomy requires them to be outside to function optimally, regardless of whether the chicken or the egg came first.
I mean, if we're having a serious discussion about this, both ideas are equally as likely to be right. Sperm production is at its peak at temperatures below internal body temp, this is a fact. What scientists don't know is whether testicles evolved to be external to facilitate this, or if they were always external and just evolved to work better at those temperatures.
But it doesn't matter, because our current anatomy requires them to be outside to function optimally, regardless of whether the chicken or the egg came first.
Wait, so what happens for eskimo or people living in super hot areas?
Wait, so what happens for eskimo or people living in super hot areas?
We are very, very good at controlling our temperature and that of our dwellings- it's a huge part of how we managed to colonize the globe. Basically the only place on earth where we didn't establish ourselves was Antarctica. Our clothes and buildings make up for the difference, basically.
I mean, testicles are actually inner organs, that's why it hurts so god damn much, if you get kicked directly in your heart, it would hurt the same as if someone kicks you in the testicles (We are talking about physical-instant pain, not dying chances, so ignore the fact that you would die if that ever happens to you)
