AniworldAI
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? tommy (kingdukeee) 331

Copyrights

  • ? persona 42k
  • ? ↳ persona 5 15k

Characters

  • ? niijima sae 362
  • ? shadow sae 67

General

  • ? 1girl 7.4M
  • ? ass 711k
  • ? back tattoo 5.2k
  • ? backless dress 18k
  • ? backless outfit 31k
  • ? bare shoulders 1.2M
  • ? black dress 319k
  • ? breasts 4.3M
  • ? butt crack 26k
  • ? closed mouth 1.6M
  • ? dark persona 14k
  • ? dragon tattoo 910
  • ? dress 1.7M
  • ? from behind 290k
  • ? gradient background 169k
  • ? grey hair 894k
  • ? large breasts 2.0M
  • ? long hair 5.4M
  • ? looking at viewer 4.3M
  • ? looking back 331k
  • ? pale skin 65k
  • ? red eyes 1.6M
  • ? red shawl 1.3k
  • ? shawl 33k
  • ? sideboob 142k
  • ? simple background 2.4M
  • ? smile 3.6M
  • ? solo 6.2M
  • ? tattoo 182k
  • ? twitter username 368k
  • ? white background 2.0M

Meta

  • ? commentary 2.5M
  • ? highres 6.9M
  • ? redrawn 2.8k

Information

  • ID: 6863035
  • Uploader: 123kid »
  • Date: about 2 years ago
  • Size: 582 KB .jpg (900x1326) »
  • Source: twitter.com/thetommietomm/status/1722751450147614914 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 98
  • Favorites: 92
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post has 1 child (learn more) « hide
post #6863035
post #4398263
Resized to 94% of original (view original)
niijima sae and shadow sae (persona and 1 more) drawn by tommy_(kingdukeee)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • sae

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    RMXFan102
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    This used to have just the artist and highres as tags, I added 20+ tags to compensate. In the future, maybe take some time to add enough tags before uploading? Not even the character was tagged even though their name was in the description...

    -3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    123kid
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    RMXFan102 said:

    This used to have just the artist and highres as tags, I added 20+ tags to compensate. In the future, maybe take some time to add enough tags before uploading? Not even the character was tagged even though their name was in the description...

    You added the dark persona tag which I forgot, thank you, but otherwise you did not add 20+ tags before I did.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    LOTR3
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    RMXFan102 said:

    This used to have just the artist and highres as tags, I added 20+ tags to compensate. In the future, maybe take some time to add enough tags before uploading? Not even the character was tagged even though their name was in the description...

    Fucking liar. Anyone can go into the tag history and see you’re bullshiting, so why do it?

    -7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    123kid
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    LOTR3 said:

    Fucking liar. Anyone can go into the tag history and see you’re bullshiting, so why do it?

    Relax. He probably opened the tag box when the post still had no tags and finished tagging by the time I already had finished mine. He still really could have checked the tag history before commenting though…

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    LOTR3
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    123kid said:

    Relax. He probably opened the tag box when the post still had no tags and finished tagging by the time I already had finished mine. He still really could have checked the tag history before commenting though…

    Dude, there was a TWO HOUR GAP between your edits and his. He certainly saw the tags you added.

    -7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Valentine322
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    LOTR3 said:

    Dude, there was a TWO HOUR GAP between your edits and his. He certainly saw the tags you added.

    The two hours is between the second and third edit. There is only two minutes between the uploader's first edit and the user's second one, so it's likely an honest timing mistake.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    LOTR3
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Valentine322 said:

    The two hours is between the second and third edit. There is only two minutes between the uploader's first edit and the user's second one, so it's likely an honest timing mistake.

    No, no it wasn’t. In all three edits, the name of the character was in the tags and there were more than 20 of said tags, RMXFan102 lied through his teeth.

    -7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    LOTR3 said:

    No, no it wasn’t. In all three edits, the name of the character was in the tags and there were more than 20 of said tags, RMXFan102 lied through his teeth.

    Just so you know, Danbooru has something like a grace period for edits. If you repeatedly opened the tag box, added a single tag, and saved it 20 times within a few minutes, the history would show all of the added tags as a single change, and not 20 separate changes. If you do your tagging fast enough after uploading, it wouldn't look like you had added those tags after the fact.

    A lot of uploaders only tag their uploads afterwards, to avoid someone else sniping them. It's very possible that RMX saw the post before 123 finished their post-upload tagging, went to add a bunch of tags themself, and were beaten to the punch. The two minutes between the first and second edits supports this. You can relax.

    4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    LOTR3
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    Just so you know, Danbooru has something like a grace period for edits. If you repeatedly opened the tag box, added a single tag, and saved it 20 times within a few minutes, the history would show all of the added tags as a single change, and not 20 separate changes. If you do your tagging fast enough after uploading, it wouldn't look like you had added those tags after the fact.

    A lot of uploaders only tag their uploads afterwards, to avoid someone else sniping them. It's very possible that RMX saw the post before 123 finished their post-upload tagging, went to add a bunch of tags themself, and were beaten to the punch. The two minutes between the first and second edits supports this. You can relax.

    I’m sorry, that doesn’t account for the fact that he only added 10 tags, with only two of said tags overlapping and one of them was merely an alternative name for this version of the character.

    -6 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    LOTR3 said:

    I’m sorry, that doesn’t account for the fact that he only added 10 tags, with only two of said tags overlapping and one of them was merely an alternative name for this version of the character.

    What the hell are you talking about? You know you can't add tags that are already present, right? It's not going to show tags that were already there. Literally that just means that half of the tags RMX tried to add were already added by 123, and he didn't check the history to see that he wasn't actually the one to add all of the tags before making his comment.

    You are being really antagonistic while having a very poor understanding of how tag history actually works. Get off his ass, he's not "lying".

    Oh, and if by "overlapping tags" you mean the two darker colored tags, that literally just means those tags were removed, which you can see in 123's second edit.

    5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Автор зеркала /