what's going on with those hands....

MysteriousLounger said:

what's going on with those hands....

Could be AI. Her panties seem to be half-lace and the shadows on them aren't consistent, she's wearing some kind of white headband that vanishes behind her hair, her hands like you mentioned, and her ear looks wrong.

Fubuki_Rena said:

Could be AI. Her panties seem to be half-lace and the shadows on them aren't consistent, she's wearing some kind of white headband that vanishes behind her hair, her hands like you mentioned, and her ear looks wrong.

Hello. I am the author of the drawing. No, it's not AI. There are problems with the hands, as I noticed an mistakes already at the time of rendering and tried to correct them. Apparently it didn't work out very well ^^'' If you need proof that this is not AI, then I can provide it.

DimashKu said:

Hello. I am the author of the drawing. No, it's not AI. There are problems with the hands, as I noticed an mistakes already at the time of rendering and tried to correct them. Apparently it didn't work out very well ^^'' If you need proof that this is not AI, then I can provide it.

If you say it's not AI then that's good enough for me. I'm not going to go on a witch hunt and demand proof.

MysteriousLounger said:

what's going on with those hands....

The artist seems to be using AI references, but don't know the underlying anatomy enough to fill in the gaps themselves. So they either fill it with randomness or cover it up. You see it very often these days from newbie artists that use AI references. I do worry about starting artists using AI as an easy answer to results or a crutch instead of a powerful tool of the process, and just end up never learning proper fundamentals themselves, because the computer is doing it for them but in partially incorrect ways that they can't tell due to them having never bothered learning the real thing, and end up carrying mistakes over and over and never improving.

Agemmata said:

The artist seems to be using AI references, but don't know the underlying anatomy themselves enough to fill in the gaps themselves. So they either fill it with randomness or cover it up. You see it very often these days from newbie artists that use AI references. I do worry about starting artists using AI as an easy answer to results or a crutch instead of a powerful tool of the process, and just end up never learning proper fundamentals themselves, because the computer is doing it for them but in partially incorrect ways that they can't tell due to them having never bothered learning the real thing, and end up carrying mistakes over and over and never improving.

I've never been accused of using AI, and to be honest, I'm upset at this point if you actually see AI here. It's a shame that artists these days have to prove they're not using AI.
However, I am grateful to the people who suggested that there was AI here. Perhaps this is a reason to change something in my drawing style. (˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶)
I analyzed the statements and in the future, if possible, I will post speedpaints. I really don't want people to label me as an AI artist-person.

DimashKu said:

I've never been accused of using AI, and to be honest, I'm upset at this point if you actually see AI here. It's a shame that artists these days have to prove they're not using AI.
However, I am grateful to the people who suggested that there was AI here. Perhaps this is a reason to change something in my drawing style. (˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶)
I analyzed the statements and in the future, if possible, I will post speedpaints. I really don't want people to label me as an AI artist-person.

Not AI. AI-referenced. Meaning they copied and/or traced an AI generated image to speed up the process. Its extremely common these days.

Agemmata said:

The artist seems to be using AI references, but don't know the underlying anatomy themselves enough to fill in the gaps themselves. So they either fill it with randomness or cover it up. You see it very often these days from newbie artists that use AI references. I do worry about starting artists using AI as an easy answer to results or a crutch instead of a powerful tool of the process, and just end up never learning proper fundamentals themselves, because the computer is doing it for them but in partially incorrect ways that they can't tell due to them having never bothered learning the real thing, and end up carrying mistakes over and over and never improving.

"The artist seems to be using other artist references, but don't know the underlying anatomy themselves enough to fill in the gaps themselves. So they either fill it with randomness or cover it up in Photoshop layers. You see it very often these days from newbie artists that use another artist references. I do worry about starting artists using Photoshop layers as an easy answer to results or a crutch instead of a real life reference for the process, and just end up never learning proper fundamentals themselves, because Photoshop is doing it for them but in partially incorrect ways that they can't tell due to them having never bothered learning the real thing, and end up carrying mistakes over and over and never improving."

Same energy from 20th century... and Shexyo art. Turn down the witch hunt please.

rom_collector said:

"The artist seems to be using other artist references, but don't know the underlying anatomy themselves enough to fill in the gaps themselves. So they either fill it with randomness or cover it up in Photoshop layers. You see it very often these days from newbie artists that use another artist references. I do worry about starting artists using Photoshop layers as an easy answer to results or a crutch instead of a real life reference for the process, and just end up never learning proper fundamentals themselves, because Photoshop is doing it for them but in partially incorrect ways that they can't tell due to them having never bothered learning the real thing, and end up carrying mistakes over and over and never improving."

Same energy from 20th century... and Shexyo art. Turn down the witch hunt please.

You might have had something there if you weren't still acting like Photoshop requires zero skill and just does everything for you. Do you even know what a layer is? Do you think that creating a layer just magically fixes everything by itself? It's just another canvas above/below the main one. You still have to make the edits yourself.