I agree that the hand doesn't look good, but how can you be sure that it isn't ai-assisted or just bad_anatomy? The style is consistent with the artist's previous works too. Is there anything else in the picture that can give it away?
I agree with above, there's no solid evidence this is AI at all, if anything AI is incapable of generating actual language most of the time. The hand is just slightly odd. If hands are your only reason for this tagging behavior then cease.
Yeah, I think more than anything it's just super jarring since the artist doesn't seem to have had any obvious/glaring hand issues before so it definitely sticks out.
I also think it is at least partially AI-generated. It has the resolution and line-quality I've come to associate with stable diffusion. Further, there's a bizarre lack of uniformity in the Japanese lettering. I don't know the profile of the alleged artist, but think someone who writes Japanese would not have so much variance in the direction of their strokes imo. Though, a native Japanese would know better than I.
Yeah, I think more than anything it's just super jarring since the artist doesn't seem to have had any obvious/glaring hand issues before so it definitely sticks out.
Yeah it doesn't feel "fully AI" to me either, but god damn that hand.
This isn't ai this is simply an artist fuck up. Seriously guys you can't just flag for AI after seeing an artist mess up a hand because AI mistakes aren't limited to just wonky hands.
This isn't ai this is simply an artist fuck up. Seriously guys you can't just flag for AI after seeing an artist mess up a hand because AI mistakes aren't limited to just wonky hands.
I agree, the style seems to be in line with the artist’s progression from earlier works. To me really the only issue with the hand is a long thumb, after all this is clearly not a hyper realism style.
