AniworldAI
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? sakurato tsuguhi 116

Copyright

  • ? touhou 1.0M

Character

  • ? wriggle nightbug 9.9k

General

  • ? 1girl 7.4M
  • ? aircraft 23k
  • ? airplane 16k
  • ? antennae 25k
  • ? blush 3.6M
  • ? bug 88k
  • ? cape 268k
  • ? fairey firefly 9
  • ? green eyes 1.1M
  • ? green hair 521k
  • ? solo 6.2M
  • ? vehicle focus 14k

Meta

  • ? commentary 2.5M
  • ? lowres 105k

Information

  • ID: 777433
  • Uploader: Gauron1786 »
  • Date: over 15 years ago
  • Approver: スラッシュ »
  • Size: 101 KB .jpg (400x400) »
  • Source: www2.odn.ne.jp/~cdo96240/gallery/1946/firefly.jpg »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 5
  • Favorites: 8
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
wriggle nightbug (touhou) drawn by sakurato_tsuguhi
  • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • « ‹ prev Pool: Touhou - Gensokyo Air Force next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Gauron1786
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Firefly

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    henmere
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Artist's commentary:

    イギリス海軍の複座艦上戦闘機。
    戦闘機なのに「生存性・安全性」とかいう理由で複座にしてしまったりするところがいかにも英国的なセンスですが、防空戦闘のほかにも攻撃や偵察までこなした万能機でした(単に複座が戦闘機に向かないだけとの話も)。フェアリー・フルマーの後継機として期待以上の性能を発揮したと言われますがそもそもフルマーが駄作すぎ。
    新型のフラップなども装備して低速性能が安定し、確かにしょっちゅう着艦フックを掴み損ねるシーファイアよりはマシだったかもしれません。
    しかしながら基本性能は当時の主流といえる航空機と遜色なく、後にレーダーを装備して夜間戦闘にも対応するなど、スピットファイア、モスキート、ソードフィッシュ、ハリケーン、タイフーン、テンペストの次ぐらいには活躍した戦闘機です。というか、周りの面子があんまりにあんまりな連中すぎるせいで非常にマトモに見える戦闘機です。
    英国機は「活躍した」と言われるだけで大分マシな方かと。

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    henmere
    over 15 years ago
    [hidden]

    Artist's commentary:

    Fairey Fulmar is a carrier borne two-seater fighter aircraft of the Royal Navy.
    Even though it is a fighter aircraft, it was turned into a two-seater citing reasons of "survival and safety." It really shows the British mentality. Still, the aircraft was a kind of multi-role fighter suitable for bombing and air reconnaissance as well as air defense battle...However there were also simple views that the two-seat airplane was not suitable to be a fighter aircraft. Although it is said that as successor of the Fairey Fulmar, it showed a performance that exceeded expectations, the Fulmar was pretty poor in the first place.
    Well, it was certainly equipped with the new type of flaps and because its ability to fly at low speeds was stable, it was probably a bit better than the Seafire, which had an arrester hook that constantly failed to engage.
    Nonetheless, its basic performance was not inferior when compared to other aircrafts considered to be mainstream at the time; it was subsequently fitted with a radar and could even be used as a night fighter; and so it was a "fighter aircraft that in terms of active service was next after the Spitfire, Mosquito, Swordfish, Hurricane, Typhoon and Tempest." Or put another way, because the reputation of the others was so bad, it was made to look like an extremely decent fighter aircraft.
    Although you might only be able to say that this British aircraft was "actively in service," I think that it might have been one of the better ones.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Автор зеркала /