You all really care about AI in hentai? I mean... It's a hentai...
It has no soul man. Plus in most cases it is made in shit quality or with ai that was educated on works of authors who doesn't give their consent on it...
It has no soul man. Plus in most cases it is made in shit quality or with ai that was educated on works of authors who doesn't give their consent on it...
To clarify on "soul". It's just that there is no effort being put into the work, which make the work itself cheap and don't give audience any incentive to care.
For one,rinjo_18's art shows slow improvement over the years,which can be seen easily on their pixiv.(https://www.pixiv.net/users/41324731) But maybe they started using ai at a later stage in their career so don't let your guard down yet.
Second,the wording on their Patreon memberships use words like "arts" and "illustrations",which no ai prompter would use,probably to avoid getting sued.
Fourth,their stuff is still on danbooru.This might be because they don't animated with ai so it's only "ai-assisted"(not sure if that qualifies for removal) but this does not excuse all the still arts with no animation that still bear that "ai-looking" art style
I might have missed something that makes so many others 100% sure that the art is ai so please let me know.This comment is in no way defending ai art,I am only trying to get to the facts with the evidence I can gather without just getting a Patreon sub to (maybe?) get the art previews.
Btw,their newer arts definitely look a lot more like ai than the preview on Twitter I linked so for me,it's still not an open and shut case.Their reluctance to post wips or timelapses for their art in the last year is still a tiny bit suspicious but that might just be because they're saving them for Patreon.I might edit this if I come across any new info.
