Images of four fingers can now be included in Danbooru. I'm certainly not against AI-generated images, but I think AI-generated images shouldn't be mixed in with human artists. There may be mistakes in the rough draft, but a drawing that is so detailed will not be drawn as four fingers.
Images of four fingers can now be included in Danbooru. I'm certainly not against AI-generated images, but I think AI-generated images shouldn't be mixed in with human artists. There may be mistakes in the rough draft, but a drawing that is so detailed will not be drawn as four fingers.
Four fingers have literally always been one of the most common errors in art long before AI-generated images were a thing, it's far from proof of AI generation.
If this is the only "proof" you have then you have to reconsider and relearn how much you actually know about identifying drawn art and generated art.
Four fingers have literally always been one of the most common errors in art long before AI-generated images were a thing, it's far from proof of AI generation.
If this is the only "proof" you have then you have to reconsider and relearn how much you actually know about identifying drawn art and generated art.
It's great to hear you talk about painting. Can you imagine yourself coloring "a hand with only four fingers" for an hour without noticing something is wrong? It's possible to make such mistakes in drafts and sketches, but the more detailed the painting, the less likely it is. As for how to determine whether an artist relies on AI or is assisted by AI, I believe there are several key factors: 1. They focus solely on the characters throughout the artwork, leaving the background mostly blurred, white, or with a simple gradient. While this is common among human artists, it's often intentional, as AI models for 2D-style artwork rarely specialize in backgrounds.Of course, this is often not conclusive evidence. 2. Generally speaking, artists using AI assistance will redraw those parts that are obviously wrong or unclear, such as the details of the character's clothing and the nails when the character is far away from the camera, but occasionally they will ignore the facial features of the head shot - such as the eyes. While AI typically doesn't make mistakes with eyes in headshots, its style is often influenced by the overall artwork, resulting in slightly different eye renderings for each IP. Combined with the sometimes unnoticed limb errors, this is how I judge AI. You think I was too arbitrary in pointing out only the limb errors, so how do you determine that this painting was not generated with the assistance of AI?
Can you imagine yourself coloring "a hand with only four fingers" for an hour without noticing something is wrong? It's possible to make such mistakes in drafts and sketches, but the more detailed the painting, the less likely it is.
No need to imagine it, you can just look it up. There are plenty of posts under artistic error. fewer digits, and bad hands, several hundreds of which are now old enough that they are legally able to vote.
Returning to the AI discussion; If you want to have this post double-checked and discussed, visit topic #22285 and drop your thoughts there. Protip, you gonna need more proof than just a single bad hand. If you are 100% confident that this is AI-slop, you can even add the ai-generated tag, flag this post and return it to the moderation queue for reconsideration.
Go through the proper channels instead of discussing it in the comment section which just gets buried in a few hours.
