Used levels to restore color and brightness to the region that had the censoring applied to it, followed by some clone to clean up the artefacts caused by inadvertently blowing out some of the pixels.
Used levels to restore color and brightness to the region that had the censoring applied to it, followed by some clone to clean up the artefacts caused by inadvertently blowing out some of the pixels.
While I agree with you that it is pointless and easy to fix...uncensored images made by anyone but the original artist aren't allowed here.
finalagent said: While I agree with you that it is pointless and easy to fix...uncensored images made by anyone but the original artist aren't allowed here.
Complain to a mod or something then. I don't make the rules, whoever likes this pic, better save it since it probably won't survive the approval phase.
finalagent said: While I agree with you that it is pointless and easy to fix...uncensored images made by anyone but the original artist aren't allowed here.
Correct, but I would bet money it was not the original artist who censored the pic in the first place. So call it twice adulterated art. Still, rules are rules.
finalagent said: uncensored images made by anyone but the original artist aren't allowed here.
This is not correct. Stop spreading lies. 3rd-party uncensoring IS looked down upon here, but these images are not explicitly banned. nude filters are, but that's an entirely different concept.
Kayako said: This is not correct. Stop spreading lies. 3rd-party uncensoring IS looked down upon here, but these images are not explicitly banned. nude filters are, but that's an entirely different concept.
It isn't? Huh, hadn't seen any in a while so I might have started to confuse it with nude filter's fate.
