So her role is bringing the food for her team?
0
Reply
gratman said:
No. Unless they add some sort of cute_boy tag. Until then I'll tag in a way that's actually helpful for people.
The reason why we don't make such tags are because those tags can be misleading, as others may not agree with personal evaluation of the picture. The picture clearly doesn't indicate anything of a trap, since there's no feminine aspect depicted. There's also no basis of using girly_boy (also known as 'otomen' in JP) since Izaya didn't enact anything girly or dressed in a girly attire.
Tags are meant to point out specific characteristics and not changes observed due to specific artstyle. Using tags that doesn't reflect the picture is not helping anyone, it's an abuse.
Rathurue said:
The reason why we don't make such tags are because those tags can be misleading, as others may not agree with personal evaluation of the picture. The picture clearly doesn't indicate anything of a trap, since there's no feminine aspect depicted. There's also no basis of using girly_boy (also known as 'otomen' in JP) since Izaya didn't enact anything girly or dressed in a girly attire.
Tags are meant to point out specific characteristics and not changes observed due to specific artstyle. Using tags that doesn't reflect the picture is not helping anyone, it's an abuse.
It's hard for me to imagine you believe what you're saying. Do you honestly believe there is nothing we can or should do to differentiate boys that look like this one to boys that look post #10175477? The idea that people looking through male_focus pictures are all looking for both types of males is asinine, and obviously not helpful. These are not the same, not drawn for the same public, and these publics should be able to look for pictures that cater to them. We had a working solution and we no longer do. Something has to be done.
gratman said:
It's hard for me to imagine you believe what you're saying. Do you honestly believe there is nothing we can or should do to differentiate boys that look like this one to boys that look post #10175477? The idea that people looking through male_focus pictures are all looking for both types of males is asinine, and obviously not helpful. These are not the same, not drawn for the same public, and these publics should be able to look for pictures that cater to them. We had a working solution and we no longer do. Something has to be done.
The thing you're missing is that you don't get to arbitrarily decide to change how existing tags are used. If you think something needs to be done, whether it be creating a new tag to cover these cases or expanding the use of an existing one, you discuss it in the forums. And if others don't agree with your proposed changes, you either continue arguing for your position or leave it be, not go against the general consensus.
Plenty of users have been banned for taking matters into their own hands like this. Don't be one of them.
Rathurue said:
The reason why we don't make such tags are because those tags can be misleading, as others may not agree with personal evaluation of the picture. The picture clearly doesn't indicate anything of a trap, since there's no feminine aspect depicted. There's also no basis of using girly_boy (also known as 'otomen' in JP) since Izaya didn't enact anything girly or dressed in a girly attire.
I left trap on because between the two, I felt it looked more "girl drawn as a boy" than "clearly a boy but effeminate." But I'm not very experienced with either tag so I'll defer to your judgment on this. The point I was trying to convey was that a character can't both obviously look like a guy and easily mistaken for a girl. The two concepts are completely incompatible with each other and that's why the tags can't be used together on the same instance of a character.
Blank_User said:
I left trap on because between the two, I felt it looked more "girl drawn as a boy" than "clearly a boy but effeminate." But I'm not very experienced with either tag so I'll defer to your judgment on this.
For the record, I was the one that removed trap, because I don’t get "passing as a girl" vibes from this. It's just a cute boy, not a trap.
blindVigil said:
For the record, I was the one that removed trap, because I don’t get "passing as a girl" vibes from this. It's just a cute boy, not a trap.
Is there any way to help people looking for cute boys to find this image under the current tagging scheme, or does a new tag need to be made?
Tnt_Moxy said:
I know those are very violent comics :T
I thought this would be a good page to upload them, since I've seen several risqué things here as well
I mean I can't complain about the images themself because they're mostly tagged properly including adding the blacklisted guro tag.
However, just to note, self-uploading is usually frowned upon here from what I understand. Also while guro isn't exactly forbidden it also has a lower chance of being approved (see help:upload rules).
Billyaabob said:
However, just to note, self-uploading is usually frowned upon here from what I understand.
That has not been true for quite a while now. Self-uploading is acceptable. They just have to be mindful that it may be harder for them to properly judge the quality of their own work.
Blank_User said:
That has not been true for quite a while now. Self-uploading is acceptable. They just have to be mindful that it may be harder for them to properly judge the quality of their own work.
I didn't knew that, maybe I should post this kind of stuff somewhere else :T
krypton1271 said:
Soo this art is on work on progress or finished?
Two spots to look at for answer, Artist's Commentary and also, the Source link. While it doesn't state if its finished or not right away, it says its available behind a pay wall, so I'd guess its finished
krypton1271 said:
Soo this art is on work on progress or finished?
You can also try looking for the full video on other sites, sometimes (sometimes) they just take a while to post it here, I recommend “Rule 34 Video” and maybe “Twitter” (it's just a recommendation, it's not certain that you'll find what you're looking for)
Oh_My said:
Was Mossa cancelled again? His twitter is locked.
Draws things people dont like. Specifically they got flamed for many artworks that implied rape happened to specific characters.
The most infamous of which both being Warhammer fanarts.
One of the Orks, where a singular Ork is pinning down a struggling girl.
And another of the many different sub-human species in the imperium. One of them had writing scarred into their flesh that basically said “inhuman fuck toy”
Tasty_power_move said:
Draws things people dont like. Specifically they got flamed for many artworks that implied rape happened to specific characters.
The most infamous of which both being Warhammer fanarts.
One of the Orks, where a singular Ork is pinning down a struggling girl.
And another of the many different sub-human species in the imperium. One of them had writing scarred into their flesh that basically said “inhuman fuck toy”
People are just pathetic little snowflakes.
Tasty_power_move said:
Draws things people dont like. Specifically they got flamed for many artworks that implied rape happened to specific characters.
The most infamous of which both being Warhammer fanarts.
One of the Orks, where a singular Ork is pinning down a struggling girl.
And another of the many different sub-human species in the imperium. One of them had writing scarred into their flesh that basically said “inhuman fuck toy”
Found the first one on danbooru, but it looked more like the thing was taunting her before eating her alive. Didn't find the second one.
