AniworldAI
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? huazha01 64

Copyrights

  • ? fate (series) 379k
  • ? ↳ fate/stay night 41k

Characters

  • ? artoria pendragon (fate) 43k
  • ? ↳ saber (fate) 19k
  • ? gilgamesh (fate) 7.7k

General

  • ? 1boy 1.9M
  • ? 1girl 7.5M
  • ? animal ears 1.5M
  • ? barcode 9.2k
  • ? black thighhighs 457k
  • ? blonde hair 1.9M
  • ? box 70k
  • ? bra 249k
  • ? cat ears 361k
  • ? cat tail 198k
  • ? fish 45k
  • ? green eyes 1.1M
  • ? heart 770k
  • ? in box 5.5k
  • ? in container 15k
  • ? mini person 37k
  • ? minigirl 30k
  • ? panties 755k
  • ? spoken heart 64k
  • ? tail 1.0M
  • ? tears 272k
  • ? thighhighs 1.4M
  • ? underwear 933k
  • ? wavy mouth 94k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 5.6M
  • ? highres 7.0M
  • ? photoshop (medium) 708k

Information

  • ID: 1602880
  • Uploader: rbc801 »
  • Date: about 12 years ago
  • Approver: NWF Renim »
  • Size: 1.24 MB .jpg (1280x1811) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/41239521 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 21
  • Favorites: 44
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 66% of original (view original)
artoria pendragon, saber, and gilgamesh (fate and 1 more) drawn by huazha01

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • プレゼント

    那些年我们萌过的金剑/双王/逗比闪...

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
    • « ‹ prev Pool: It's Dangerous to Go Alone! Take This. next › »
    • « ‹ prev Pool: Unhappy Adorable next › »
    • « ‹ prev Pool: Your Shipment Has Arrived next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    CookieLoop
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    Who the hell keeps deleting this out of "Disgustingly Adorable"?

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    CookieLoop said:

    Who the hell keeps deleting this out of "Disgustingly Adorable"?

    The better question is why it keeps getting put back in.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Mithiwithi
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said

    The better question is why it keeps getting put back in.

    What OOZ662 said. An awful lot of merely somewhat cute pictures like this one have been creeping into this pool lately, and it's been long overdue for a culling.

    -4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CookieLoop
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said:

    The better question is why it keeps getting put back in.

    As long as there are pics that are barely cute in the pool compared to this one, I'll just keep putting it in... since it's already above the average of the pool.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Darkagma
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    CookieLoop said:

    As long as there are pics that are barely cute in the pool compared to this one, I'll just keep putting it in... since it's already above the average of the pool.

    This is not environmentally friendly. You could use that effort to clean part of the mess in the pool instead...

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    CookieLoop said:

    As long as there are pics that are barely cute in the pool compared to this one, I'll just keep putting it in... since it's already above the average of the pool.

    The funny part being that it keeps getting removed because RiderFan is trying to clean out the pool of subpar material. Mobius loops are fun.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Mithiwithi
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    CookieLoop said:

    As long as there are pics that are barely cute in the pool compared to this one, I'll just keep putting it in... since it's already above the average of the pool.

    Which ones? We'll remove them too. To give you some idea of where the quality bar should be, post #786581 was heavily debated and eventually deemed unworthy.

    This is just like the image deletion appeal arguments we periodically have: the approval of other images of lower quality than the one under discussion isn't an argument for approving it, it's an argument that the other images were incorrectly approved. We're just working with a much higher bar here.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CookieLoop
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    Mithiwithi said:

    Which ones? We'll remove them too. To give you some idea of where the quality bar should be, post #786581 was heavily debated and eventually deemed unworthy.

    This is just like the image deletion appeal arguments we periodically have: the approval of other images of lower quality than the one under discussion isn't an argument for approving it, it's an argument that the other images were incorrectly approved. We're just working with a much higher bar here.

    We can start with the mostly generic Pokemon ones, like the generic bulbasaur with the slightly tilted head from a while back... pokenerds just need to step down from this pool for being too biased; I mean hell, the first pic is just a cat with a coin glued to it's forehead... and this is coming from a cat person.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Tetsamaru
    almost 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    CookieLoop said:
    We can start with the mostly generic Pokemon ones, like the generic bulbasaur with the slightly tilted head from a while back... pokenerds just need to step down from this pool for being too biased; I mean hell, the first pic is just a cat with a coin glued to it's forehead... and this is coming from a cat person.

    Bring this up in the forums. what you are suggesting is a very big change to the pool itself.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Автор зеркала /