That beer looks like an Asahi 500ml/pint can. A can like that measures 7-7-17cm, focusing on the 17cm length and translating the number to freedom units, that's just barely under 6.7 inches. If we put the can to the base of her torso where her breasts are connected to her main body and focus only on her left breast, the length of her breasts from base to nipple tip measures at an approximated minimum of 2 and 7/8ths beer cans or 19.27 inches, OR 48.88cm in length by eyeballing.

Now naturally that was simply the length of one breast, but what about the width? We'll be measuring that by eyeballing it on a flat plane by using the can's width, which, translating to a real 500ml can is 7cm, or 2.76 inches. This one is slightly easier to do, as her right breast is directly facing our direction. By putting it to the fullest part of her breasts, the midsection of course, this measures to 10.13 inches, or 25.73cm. For a single breast. If pressed together, that would be an astounding 51.46cm or 20.26 inches for both breasts from side to side.

What would this mean? That I cannot tell you, for I have no answer. I do not possess the tools as to gather her true size. Assuming that her breast length is 48.88 in length, and 51.46cm in width, both assuming separated from the base of her chest, we are missing the final plane to garner the final calculation. That being her torso, or underband circumference, the measurement that excludes her mammaries.

Sadly, I wish I could give you an answer, but I can only eyeball it from here. It appears that her breast circumference, from the tips of her breasts, adding to the circumference of her bare torso, her breast size measures approximately around 130-140cm of circumference. However, this is mere guesswork by way of optical approximation, and thus I bring shame to those who practice Mammarology. Forgive me for my failure, my peers and contemporaries, I cannot find the true dimensions of this mammoth measure.

Dongn said:
Boobs math

Keep up the good work