All the "legendary commander" tag should be changed to "Andersen" now
The Legendary Commander tag should be used when it's the past version of him. Andersen should be used when it's the present version of him. If anything, "the_legendary_commander_(nikke)" should be implicated to "andersen_(nikke)," just like how "snow_white_(innocent_days)_(nikke)" is implicated to "snow_white_(nikke)."
The Legendary Commander tag should be used when it's the past version of him. Andersen should be used when it's the present version of him. If anything, "the_legendary_commander_(nikke)" should be aliased to "andersen_(nikke)," just like how "snow_white_(innocent_days)_(nikke)" is aliased to "snow_white_(nikke)."
It should be "implication", not "alias"; but yeah, I agree with the implication.
All those downvotes, the hidden message, and aggressive replies just because I gave advice on changing my tag. This website is incredibly toxic, it's not the first time I've been treated like this.
All those downvotes, the hidden message, and aggressive replies just because I gave advice on changing my tag. This website is incredibly toxic, it's not the first time I've been treated like this.
I have no comment on the downvotes, but what makes you think the replies were aggressive? No one insulted you. They were only explaining how the tags are currently used and how to make a formal request to change the tags.
Anyway, as this seems to be the character's past appearance, I'll be removing the Andersen_(Nikke) tag for the reasons given above.
All those downvotes, the hidden message, and aggressive replies just because I gave advice on changing my tag. This website is incredibly toxic, it's not the first time I've been treated like this.
More like avoiding spoilers being plastered in the comment section and how tags works while the event is still active is my take.
It's an IN event bit of information, meaning once the event ends, it will be back to being a "not obvious" information for newcomers. Would that be a spoiler to them or not?
It will take quite some time for this event to be placed in the Archives, too.
It's an IN event bit of information, meaning once the event ends, it will be back to being a "not obvious" information for newcomers. Would that be a spoiler to them or not?
It will take quite some time for this event to be placed in the Archives, too.
That's always hard to answer. Cause there is never really a consensus for when something becomes "Public spoiler knowledge". Anakin Skywalker is Darthvader or whatever. 1 year? does it count if even the developers or animation studio doesn't treat it like a secret anymore? Every anime and manga publisher out there pretty much couldn't stop riffing on Goku's new Ultra instinct form as soon as it came out, if you didn't see the episode day 1, you were instantly spoiled if not by official channels, then just going on the internet for 2 seconds or youtube. Or you could be just a young person just being exposed to anime, you already know what a Super Saiyan is. I remember a similar argument happened with Magica Madoka's infamous episode 3. It was hard not to spoiled on that at the time.
It's an IN event bit of information, meaning once the event ends, it will be back to being a "not obvious" information for newcomers. Would that be a spoiler to them or not?
It will take quite some time for this event to be placed in the Archives, too.
I think there's a slight difference between spoiling something the day it comes out and waiting until the event is over to spoil things. At the very least, give people some time to at least try and complete the event before discussing spoilers in the open.
