Pretty sure post #9141005 should still be the parent since it's a far higher resolution, it's obviously the best version according to help:post relationships

fuzzbawlz said:

Pretty sure post #9141005 should still be the parent since it's a far higher resolution, it's obviously the best version according to help:post relationships

When cropped and whole versions of the same image has been uploaded

AkaringoP said:

It's not exactly cropped if the artist uploaded post #9141005 first and added the extra stuff here later, is it? And the example it gives on that line in the wiki (post #1540326), despite being uncropped, is lower resolution and currently set as the child of post #1540323. And that's only in the "when to use post relationships" section, the relevant section you should be looking at is "Choosing the best parent".

• Most recent active revision. There are exceptional cases where the latest revision is worse (ie, much smaller resolution, unless both are already absurdres) than the previous image

This post doesn't seem to revise the art in the first place, just shrinks it down and adds an additional section.

• Highest resolution. If a picture has been upscaled, the upscaled version should be the child.

post #9141005

fuzzbawlz quoted:

• Most recent active revision. There are exceptional cases where the latest revision is worse (ie, much smaller resolution, unless both are already absurdres) than the previous image

• Highest resolution. If a picture has been upscaled, the upscaled version should be the child.

Your argument only applies to cases involving identical images, like post #9753195. Since when do we call it 'the identical images' when one is unidirectionally contained within the other?